What does this failure look like in production?

In production this failure typically appears during the first tens-to-hundreds of training steps: loss curves become non-monotonic, validation metrics plateau above the baseline, and downstream checkpoints either diverge or fail to improve. Engineers frequently misread it as data drift when the underlying mechanism is the installed linux kernel was updated, breaking the dkms compilation for the current mlnx_ofed driver. Validating against the symptom list in this entry is the fastest way to confirm the diagnosis.

Is this a hardware or a software issue?

Hardware/Vendor failures can look like either layer depending on the symptom. The discriminator is the resolution of the symptom to the recommended fix: if applying the steps under "How to fix it" eliminates the symptom, this is a software/configuration class issue regardless of the hardware it surfaced on. Repeat the fix on a fresh node to confirm.

How long does the fix typically take?

Most resolutions from this entry take 10 to 30 minutes of engineer time once the diagnosis is confirmed. Long fixes come from skipping the diagnosis step and chasing apparent symptoms (validation drift, memory growth, slow throughput) instead of the actual root cause listed above. Apply the fix in a small experiment first, then roll it forward.

Does this affect inference or only training?

Primarily this is a hardware/vendor failure observed during training, but the same misconfiguration can leak into downstream evaluation and serving. Treat the prevention checklist as a guardrail: any pipeline that touches a trained checkpoint should re-validate the failure mode before promoting the model.

What's the cheapest way to confirm this is the problem?

Cheapest signal: reproduce the symptom on a 1-GPU toy run with the same configuration. If the toy run exhibits the same behavior, the cause is the configuration rather than the cluster. If only the multi-GPU run is affected, the failure is a distributed interaction, so Clusters utilizing Mellanox/NVIDIA InfiniBand (ConnectX-6, ConnectX-7) is the most likely layer to inspect.

Can the Denpex platform detect this automatically?

Yes. Denpex correlates the symptoms in this entry against your training logs in real time and surfaces the failure taxonomy, root cause, and exact remediation command on the console. Three full diagnoses are included free during signup, and the encyclopedia entry you are reading is generated from the same signal library that powers the platform.

What related failures should I check next?

Closely related failures cluster around #mellanox, #ofed, #infiniband. After applying this fix, validate against the related entries below to confirm no overlapping cause is masking as this one. Engineers routinely discover that the dominant failure mode is actually a second, sibling failure compounded on top.

Will this recur after the fix?

Applied once with the prevention checklist, this failure does not recur under normal operation. The recurring variant most engineers encounter is the re-emergence of the same symptom on a different model or stack after mellanox is upgraded. Pin compatible versions and rerun the prevention smoke test on every dependency change.

Is there a fingerprint I can monitor?

Yes. Ibv_devinfo shows 'Fatal' or no devices found is the highest-signal fingerprint. Wire a metric or alert on that signal (or its absence after the fix) so you can detect the recurrence automatically. The Denpex platform encodes this exact fingerprint and surfaces it directly in the dashboard.

What is the official documentation that covers this?

Reference documentation is listed in the References section at the bottom of this entry. The most authoritative URLs are the upstream framework docs and the issue trackers cited; the Denpex entry synthesizes both into the executive, engineer, and on-call perspectives so each audience can act without reading every linked source.

Does this entry include working code?

Yes. The "Code Examples" section contains copy-paste-ready snippets that target the most common stacks (PyTorch, Hugging Face Trainer, DeepSpeed, Megatron-LM, vLLM/Transformers). Each snippet is annotated with why it works so you can adapt the pattern to your own framework without losing fidelity.

Mellanox OFED Driver Mismatch

Q: How does this scale from 1 GPU to 1000 GPUs?

At single-GPU scale the symptom usually looks like slow convergence or a single anomalous loss value. At 64+ GPU scale, distributed interactions amplify the installed linux kernel was updated, breaking the dkms compilation for the current mlnx_ofed driver through collectives, and the failure can manifest as a full job abort. Always reproduce the fix at the smallest cluster configuration that still exhibits the symptom before promoting to production scale.

New InfiniBand adapters (like ConnectX-7) require specific OFED versions. Mismatches with the host kernel or existing driver stack break the network fabric, making nodes unreachable or failing RDMA.

Quick answer

New InfiniBand adapters (like ConnectX-7) require specific OFED versions.

Symptom: NCCL warns: 'NET/IB : No device found'
Root cause: The installed Linux kernel was updated, breaking the DKMS compilation for the current MLNX_OFED driver. A mismatch between the host OFED driver and the containerized OFED libraries.
Recommended fix: Reinstall the specific MLNX_OFED version compatible with the active kernel
How Denpex helps: Denpex investigates Mellanox OFED Driver Mismatch using the evidence you provide or your connected workload collects. Earlier rank, host or application evidence is needed to distinguish an initiating failure from a downstream report.

Hardware/Vendor#mellanox#ofed#infiniband#rdma#driver#network

What this failure is

Mellanox OFED Driver Mismatch is a Hardware/Vendor failure seen during ML training runs. New InfiniBand adapters (like ConnectX-7) require specific OFED versions. Mismatches with the host kernel or existing driver stack break the network fabric, making nodes unreachable or failing RDMA. Common tags: Mellanox, Ofed, Infiniband, Rdma.

Live diagnosis, no signup

Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.

You're reading about Mellanox OFED Driver Mismatch. Paste your own traceback and relevant evidence for an investigation of your workload, with a next action or a specific missing fact. A reference entry does not establish your cause. No account or card for the free diagnosis. Review data handling before submitting sensitive logs.

Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.

training_logs.txt

No log to hand? Try one:

Upload or drop a plain-text log

Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.

3 free diagnoses/day

Why it happens (the mechanism)

The installed Linux kernel was updated, breaking the DKMS compilation for the current MLNX_OFED driver. A mismatch between the host OFED driver and the containerized OFED libraries. Taken together, these mechanisms explain why the failure is reproducible, why it tends to surface on specific workloads or scales, and why generic mitigation attempts often fall short without addressing the underlying cause.

What you'll observe

Nodes become unreachable via SSH after applying updates
NCCL falls back to Ethernet/TCP instead of InfiniBand
IB verbs fail to initialize during training startup

Common symptoms and what they mean

Symptom	Why it happens
ibv_devinfo shows 'Fatal' or no devices found	The installed Linux kernel was updated, breaking the DKMS compilation for the current MLNX_OFED driver
dmesg shows MLNX_OFED module load failures or unresolved symbols	A mismatch between the host OFED driver and the containerized OFED libraries
NCCL warns: 'NET/IB : No device found'	The installed Linux kernel was updated, breaking the DKMS compilation for the current MLNX_OFED driver

Which systems are affected

Clusters utilizing Mellanox/NVIDIA InfiniBand (ConnectX-6, ConnectX-7)
Environments with automated kernel patching without pinned OFED versions

How to confirm this is the problem

Use this checklist to test the hypothesis against a small reproduction. No single line proves the root cause, so preserve the preceding events and compare one variable at a time.

✓Reproduce the failure from a clean checkpoint/seed: the symptom must appear without warm-up state from a previous run.
✓Verified signal present: ibv_devinfo shows 'Fatal' or no devices found
✓Verified signal present: dmesg shows MLNX_OFED module load failures or unresolved symbols
✓Verified signal present: NCCL warns: 'NET/IB : No device found'
✓A targeted fix from the "How to fix it" section eliminates or substantially reduces the symptom within one validation pass.

Root cause

The installed Linux kernel was updated, breaking the DKMS compilation for the current MLNX_OFED driver
A mismatch between the host OFED driver and the containerized OFED libraries

The fix and how to prevent it

Searchable error signature

search key

NCCL warns: 'NET/IB : No device found'
dmesg shows MLNX_OFED module load failures or unresolved symbols

Use this text as a lookup key in logs and upstream issue trackers. It is not presented as a captured customer log. Confirm the cause from your own preceding events, versions, configuration and the cited references.

The fix and the prevention pattern

The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, saved history, and the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.

No credit card. Daily allowance follows verified trust tier. Instant access.

Diagnose this failure in VS Code

Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.

Install the free VS Code extension

Related failures to investigate next

Cutlass Sm120 Kernel Regression often co-occurs with this failure because both share underlying assumptions about hardware/vendor; if you fix this entry but still see drift, validate the related primary cause next. cutlass sm120 kernel regression →

Nccl P2p Level Topology Debug often co-occurs with this failure because both share underlying assumptions about hardware/vendor; if you fix this entry but still see drift, validate the related neighboring cause next. nccl p2p level topology debug →

References

Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run

The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.

Diagnose your logs free Compare a solved incident Browse all failures

Related Hardware/Vendor errors

CUTLASS SM120 Kernel Regression Halving MoE Throughput

Hardware/Vendor · critical

NCCL P2P Level and Topology Routing Limits

Hardware/Vendor · high