Straggler / Slow-Rank Detection
One rank runs slower than the rest, so every collective waits on it. There is no crash and no error. Just falling throughput and idle GPUs. Stragglers are the dominant cause of silent efficiency loss at scale and must be detected by comparing per-rank step times, not by waiting for a timeout.
One rank runs slower than the rest, so every collective waits on it.
What this failure is
Straggler / Slow-Rank Detection is a Reliability failure seen during ML training runs. One rank runs slower than the rest, so every collective waits on it. There is no crash and no error. Just falling throughput and idle GPUs. Stragglers are the dominant cause of silent efficiency loss at scale and must be detected by comparing per-rank step times, not by waiting for a timeout. Common tags: Straggler, Slow Rank, Reliability, Distributed.
Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.
You're reading about Straggler / Slow-Rank Detection. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.
Want 14 days on the Scale plan?
Request an evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates up to 50 diagnoses a day, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card or automatic subscription.
Why it happens (the mechanism)
A degraded GPU (thermal throttle, ECC row-remap, reduced clocks) on one rank. Slower network path (oversubscribed link, bad cable, PFC pause storms) to one node. CPU/dataloader contention starving one rank's input pipeline. NUMA / PCIe misconfiguration on a single host. Taken together, these mechanisms explain why the failure is reproducible, why it tends to surface on specific workloads or scales, and why generic mitigation attempts often fall short without addressing the underlying cause.
What you'll observe
- Throughput drops with no error in the logs
- All ranks block at all-reduce waiting on one slow rank
- Step time is dominated by the slowest rank
Common symptoms and what they mean
| Symptom | Why it happens |
|---|---|
| One rank's step time is consistently 1.5-10x the median | A degraded GPU (thermal throttle, ECC row-remap, reduced clocks) on one rank |
| GPU utilization on most ranks oscillates between 100% and 0% (waiting) | Slower network path (oversubscribed link, bad cable, PFC pause storms) to one node |
| MFU / tokens-per-second degrades over hours without a config change | CPU/dataloader contention starving one rank's input pipeline |
| No NCCL timeout fires because the slow rank still responds, just late | NUMA / PCIe misconfiguration on a single host |
Which systems are affected
- Large multi-node data/tensor-parallel training
- Heterogeneous nodes or mixed GPU SKUs
- Shared clusters with noisy neighbors
- Jobs sensitive to a single thermally-throttled or ECC-degraded GPU
How to confirm this is the problem
Use this checklist to test the hypothesis against a small reproduction. No single line proves the root cause, so preserve the preceding events and compare one variable at a time.
- ✓Reproduce the failure from a clean checkpoint/seed: the symptom must appear without warm-up state from a previous run.
- ✓Verified signal present: One rank's step time is consistently 1.5-10x the median
- ✓Verified signal present: GPU utilization on most ranks oscillates between 100% and 0% (waiting)
- ✓Verified signal present: MFU / tokens-per-second degrades over hours without a config change
- ✓Verified signal present: No NCCL timeout fires because the slow rank still responds, just late
- ✓A targeted fix from the "How to fix it" section eliminates or substantially reduces the symptom within one validation pass.
The fix and the prevention pattern
The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, saved history, and the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.
Sign up free. Unlock the full analysisNo credit card. Daily allowance follows verified trust tier. Instant access.
Diagnose this failure in VS Code
Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.
Install the free VS Code extensionRelated failures to investigate next
Root cause
- A degraded GPU (thermal throttle, ECC row-remap, reduced clocks) on one rank
- Slower network path (oversubscribed link, bad cable, PFC pause storms) to one node
- CPU/dataloader contention starving one rank's input pipeline
- NUMA / PCIe misconfiguration on a single host
The fix and how to prevent it
Evaluate Denpex on your own logs
Request a Scale evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates 14 days with up to 50 diagnoses a day. Every account keeps its current diagnosis allowance and gets a verification path. No card or automatic subscription.
Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run
The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.
Related Reliability errors
Sequence Length Imbalance Causing Distributed Training Stragglers
Reliability · high
Silent Data Corruption from GPU Hardware Faults Causing Loss Spikes and Model Divergence
Reliability · critical
NIXL Firmware Page Registration Fan-Out Triggers Host OOM Kills on HGX H200 and B200
Reliability · critical
MTTF Scaling Inversely with GPU Count in Large ML Research Clusters
Reliability · high