Skip to content

NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect

GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all. This entry explains how to confirm the cause, apply the fix, and separate it from adjacent gdr-fabric failures.

Quick answer

NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect means GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all. Preserve the first preceding error, then run the targeted control below.

Communication#gdr-fabric#nccl#gdr#cross#numa#upi

What this failure is

The literal signature is "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect". It is a communication failure associated with GPUDirect RDMA, RoCE, GDRCopy, and NUMA topology. The line identifies the failing operation or subsystem, while the surrounding evidence decides whether it is the initiating fault or a downstream symptom.

Live diagnosis, no signup

Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.

You're reading about NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.

training_logs.txt
No log to hand? Try one:
3 free diagnoses/day

Want 14 days of full access?

Request a free trial code for unlimited diagnoses, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card.

Request 14-day trial

Why it happens (the mechanism)

GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all. The failure becomes visible at this call site because the operation first requires the missing resource, valid state, healthy peer, or correct result. Earlier log lines and a known-good control carry more causal value than the final wrapper exception.

What you'll observe

  • The workload stops or loses forward progress after emitting "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect".
  • A retry on the same configuration reproduces the failure because the causal state has not changed.
  • The outer framework exception can hide the rank, node, allocation, or dependency that failed first.
  • Increasing timeouts or reducing workload size can suppress the symptom without correcting the cause.

Common symptoms and what they mean

SymptomWhy it happens
NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnectGPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all.
The same operation fails at a consistent stage of GPUDirect RDMA, RoCE, GDRCopy, and NUMA topology.The decisive evidence is the first log line that precedes "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" and differs from a healthy run.
The first related warning appears before the final exception and names the causal subsystem.A nearby failure remains a competing hypothesis until a control separates configuration, capacity, transport, and hardware causes.
A known-good control changes one variable and either reproduces or clears the failure.GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all.

Which systems are affected

  • GPUDirect RDMA, RoCE, GDRCopy, and NUMA topology
  • production-shaped multi-accelerator workloads
  • containerized and bare-metal deployments of the same stack

How to confirm this is the problem

Apply the following checklist to a small reproduction: each box below is a positive signal that you are looking at this exact failure rather than a sibling in the same taxonomy.

  • Find the first occurrence of "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" and preserve at least 100 lines before it.
  • Identify which rank, node, device, or process emitted the first related warning.
  • read the topology matrix, a PIX or PXB path is local; SYS means it crosses the CPU interconnect. Any GPU-HCA pair showing SYS will take this path. Also confirm process CPU affinity places the rank on the matching NUMA node.
  • Repeat the same input after the targeted change and require the signature to disappear.
  • Resume from job start with corrected NIC binding only after the control passes.

Example training logs (fingerprint)

training.log (synthetic fingerprint)
NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect

Timestamps and exact values vary across runs, but the pattern. An info-level start, an early WARN, an ERROR carrying the symptom. Is the actual fingerprint you should alert on. The Denpex platform flags this combination automatically.

The fix and the prevention pattern

The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, keeps your diagnoses instead of discarding them, and unlocks the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.

Sign up free. Unlock the full analysis

No credit card · 3 free diagnoses · Instant access

Why the recommended fix works

bind each rank to the NIC on its own NUMA node, set NCCL_IB_HCA per rank based on topology rather than letting NCCL pick. nvidia-smi topo -m shows which HCA is local to which GPU. This changes the condition in the causal diagnosis instead of hiding the outer exception. The repeated control proves ownership before recovery from job start with corrected NIC binding.

Code examples

snippet
# Preserve evidence before restarting
NCCL_DEBUG=INFO NCCL_DEBUG_SUBSYS=INIT,NET,COLL torchrun train.py
ibstat
ethtool -S <interface>

# Find the exact signature in the complete log
rg -n -F -- "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" <log-file>

Adapt the snippet to your framework. The same pattern holds for PyTorch Lightning, Hugging Face Trainer, DeepSpeed, Megatron-LM, and vLLM training wrappers. Where the wrapper exposes a config flag (for examplelr_scheduler_type in Trainer), prefer the flag over the imperative API to keep the schedule declarative and reproducible.

Best practices by model family

Model / StackRecommendationNotes
First responsePreserve the first failureKeep the context before "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" so aggregation does not erase causality.
ConfirmationChange one variableUse a known-good node, rank, input, or configuration as the control.
RecoveryResume from job start with corrected NIC bindingResume only after the literal signature no longer appears in the same control.

With the fix vs without the fix

DimensionWith the fixWithout the fix
EvidenceFirst preceding error and one controlled comparisonOnly the final aggregated exception
Fixbind each rank to the NIC on its own NUMA node, set NCCL_IB_HCA per rank based on topology rather than letting NCCL pick. nvidia-smi topo -m shows which HCA is local to which GPU.Retrying the unchanged workload
Exit criterion"NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" is absent in the repeated controlThe job happened to run once

Real engineering notes

Treat "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" as a search key and an investigation checkpoint, not as proof of every cause associated with the phrase. The high-value evidence is what changed immediately before it and whether the failure follows the workload, node, or configuration.

Visual fingerprint

Decision path for NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect
literal error captured
        |
        v
find first preceding failure
        |
        v
run one known-good control
        |
        +-- follows workload --> inspect input or configuration
        +-- follows node ------> inspect hardware or platform
        +-- disappears --------> validate the targeted fix
The control separates workload, configuration, and node ownership before recovery from job start with corrected NIC binding.

Diagnose this failure in VS Code

Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.

Install the free VS Code extension

NCCL errors in context

NCCL is where a distributed job reports failure, which is not the same as where it failed. The hub lists every common NCCL error next to what it actually indicates, and the environment variables that tell them apart.

Compare every nccl error side by side

Root cause

  • GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all.
  • The decisive evidence is the first log line that precedes "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" and differs from a healthy run.
  • A nearby failure remains a competing hypothesis until a control separates configuration, capacity, transport, and hardware causes.

The fix and how to prevent it

Unlock the full remediation runbook

14 days on the Scale plan, up to 50 diagnoses a day. Step-by-step remediation, the RMA evidence payload, and multi-node correlation on your own logs. No card, and it does not roll into a subscription.

We send a single-use code to that address. Company addresses only, the free diagnoses above stay open to everyone, and keeping trials to work email is how we keep them open.

Frequently asked questions

Twelve targeted questions that engineers and on-call staff most commonly ask about this failure.

What does "NCCL WARN Direct RDMA write between GPU NUMA and HCA NUMA failed UPI interconnect" mean?
GPUDirect RDMA was attempted between a GPU and a NIC on different NUMA nodes. The transfer has to cross the CPU interconnect (UPI/Infinity Fabric), which is far slower than a local path and on some platforms is not supported for peer-to-peer at all.
Is this line always the root cause?
No. It can be the direct failure or the point where an earlier failure becomes visible. The first preceding error and a controlled comparison decide which.
What should I collect before restarting?
Collect complete log context, the emitting rank or node, component versions, resolved configuration, and the diagnostic output shown above.
What is the fastest confirmation?
read the topology matrix, a PIX or PXB path is local; SYS means it crosses the CPU interconnect. Any GPU-HCA pair showing SYS will take this path. Also confirm process CPU affinity places the rank on the matching NUMA node.
How do I prevent it from recurring?
derive rank-to-NIC binding from nvidia-smi topo -m at job start rather than hardcoding, so the same script is correct across node types.

Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run

The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.