1-2 GPU Hardware Failures Per Week During BLOOM 176B Training on 384 A100 GPUs
During the 4-month training of the 176B-parameter BLOOM model on 384 NVIDIA A100 GPUs, the team experienced 1-2 GPU hardware failures per week on average. Each failure required a 30-60 minute node replacement and checkpoint rollback. The cluster used 48 nodes with 32 spare GPUs available for hot-swap replacement.
During the 4-month training of the 176B-parameter BLOOM model on 384 NVIDIA A100 GPUs, the team experienced 1-2 GPU hardware failures per week on average.
What this failure is
1-2 GPU Hardware Failures Per Week During BLOOM 176B Training on 384 A100 GPUs is a Reliability failure seen during ML training runs. During the 4-month training of the 176B-parameter BLOOM model on 384 NVIDIA A100 GPUs, the team experienced 1-2 GPU hardware failures per week on average. Each failure required a 30-60 minute node replacement and checkpoint rollback. The cluster used 48 nodes with 32 spare GPUs available for hot-swap replacement. Common tags: Huggingface, Bloom, A100, Hardware Failure.
Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.
You're reading about 1-2 GPU Hardware Failures Per Week During BLOOM 176B Training on 384 A100 GPUs. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.
Want 14 days on the Scale plan?
Request an evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates up to 50 diagnoses a day, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card or automatic subscription.
Why it happens (the mechanism)
Infant mortality of GPU components (HBM2e, NVLink bridges) in newly provisioned cluster. Thermal cycling during training start/stop wears solder joints on GPU package. Single GPU failure brings down its entire 8-GPU node, affecting all parallel ranks on that host. Taken together, these mechanisms explain why the failure is reproducible, why it tends to surface on specific workloads or scales, and why generic mitigation attempts often fall short without addressing the underlying cause.
What you'll observe
- Training interrupted 1-2 times per week by GPU failure detected via XID error or NCCL timeout
- Failed GPU replacement required 30-60 minutes even with hot spares available
- Checkpoint rollback loses 1.5 hours of training progress on average
Common symptoms and what they mean
| Symptom | Why it happens |
|---|---|
| XID 79 (GPU fallen off bus) or XID 48 (double bit ECC error) in dmesg | Infant mortality of GPU components (HBM2e, NVLink bridges) in newly provisioned cluster |
| NCCL timeout error on specific rank that maps to a single GPU on a single node | Thermal cycling during training start/stop wears solder joints on GPU package |
| nvidia-smi shows the affected GPU as ERR! with non-zero retired pages count | Single GPU failure brings down its entire 8-GPU node, affecting all parallel ranks on that host |
Which systems are affected
- NVIDIA A100 80GB clusters with 384+ GPUs
- Long-duration training runs (>1 month) on research clusters
- New cluster deployments where hardware infant mortality is high
How to confirm this is the problem
Use this checklist to test the hypothesis against a small reproduction. No single line proves the root cause, so preserve the preceding events and compare one variable at a time.
- ✓Reproduce the failure from a clean checkpoint/seed: the symptom must appear without warm-up state from a previous run.
- ✓Verified signal present: XID 79 (GPU fallen off bus) or XID 48 (double bit ECC error) in dmesg
- ✓Verified signal present: NCCL timeout error on specific rank that maps to a single GPU on a single node
- ✓Verified signal present: nvidia-smi shows the affected GPU as ERR! with non-zero retired pages count
- ✓A targeted fix from the "How to fix it" section eliminates or substantially reduces the symptom within one validation pass.
The fix and the prevention pattern
The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, saved history, and the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.
Sign up free. Unlock the full analysisNo credit card. Daily allowance follows verified trust tier. Instant access.
Diagnose this failure in VS Code
Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.
Install the free VS Code extensionRelated failures to investigate next
Root cause
- Infant mortality of GPU components (HBM2e, NVLink bridges) in newly provisioned cluster
- Thermal cycling during training start/stop wears solder joints on GPU package
- Single GPU failure brings down its entire 8-GPU node, affecting all parallel ranks on that host
The fix and how to prevent it
Evaluate Denpex on your own logs
Request a Scale evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates 14 days with up to 50 diagnoses a day. Every account keeps its current diagnosis allowance and gets a verification path. No card or automatic subscription.
Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run
The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.
Related Reliability errors
Sequence Length Imbalance Causing Distributed Training Stragglers
Reliability · high
Silent Data Corruption from GPU Hardware Faults Causing Loss Spikes and Model Divergence
Reliability · critical
NIXL Firmware Page Registration Fan-Out Triggers Host OOM Kills on HGX H200 and B200
Reliability · critical
MTTF Scaling Inversely with GPU Count in Large ML Research Clusters
Reliability · high