DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted
HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced. This entry explains how to confirm the cause, apply the fix, and separate it from adjacent telemetry failures.
DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted means HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced. Preserve the first preceding error, then run the targeted control below.
What this failure is
The literal signature is "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted". It is a hardware failure associated with NVIDIA telemetry, DCGM, NVML, power, and cooling. The line identifies the failing operation or subsystem, while the surrounding evidence decides whether it is the initiating fault or a downstream symptom.
Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.
You're reading about DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.
Want 14 days of full access?
Request a free trial code for unlimited diagnoses, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card.
Why it happens (the mechanism)
HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced. The failure becomes visible at this call site because the operation first requires the missing resource, valid state, healthy peer, or correct result. Earlier log lines and a known-good control carry more causal value than the final wrapper exception.
What you'll observe
- The workload stops or loses forward progress after emitting "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted".
- A retry on the same configuration reproduces the failure because the causal state has not changed.
- The outer framework exception can hide the rank, node, allocation, or dependency that failed first.
- Increasing timeouts or reducing workload size can suppress the symptom without correcting the cause.
Common symptoms and what they mean
| Symptom | Why it happens |
|---|---|
| DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted | HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced. |
| The same operation fails at a consistent stage of NVIDIA telemetry, DCGM, NVML, power, and cooling. | The decisive evidence is the first log line that precedes "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" and differs from a healthy run. |
| The first related warning appears before the final exception and names the causal subsystem. | A nearby failure remains a competing hypothesis until a control separates configuration, capacity, transport, and hardware causes. |
| A known-good control changes one variable and either reproduces or clears the failure. | HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced. |
Which systems are affected
- NVIDIA telemetry, DCGM, NVML, power, and cooling
- production-shaped multi-accelerator workloads
- containerized and bare-metal deployments of the same stack
How to confirm this is the problem
Apply the following checklist to a small reproduction: each box below is a positive signal that you are looking at this exact failure rather than a sibling in the same taxonomy.
- ✓Find the first occurrence of "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" and preserve at least 100 lines before it.
- ✓Identify which rank, node, device, or process emitted the first related warning.
- ✓nvidia-smi -q -d ROW_REMAPPER (check "Remapping Failure Occurred" and the pending/available counts); nvidia-smi -q -d ECC for the volatile/aggregate DBE trend; dcgmi diag -r 3.
- ✓Repeat the same input after the targeted change and require the signature to disappear.
- ✓Resume from checkpoint predating the first remap failure only after the control passes.
Example training logs (fingerprint)
DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhaustedTimestamps and exact values vary across runs, but the pattern. An info-level start, an early WARN, an ERROR carrying the symptom. Is the actual fingerprint you should alert on. The Denpex platform flags this combination automatically.
The fix and the prevention pattern
The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, keeps your diagnoses instead of discarding them, and unlocks the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.
Sign up free. Unlock the full analysisNo credit card · 3 free diagnoses · Instant access
Why the recommended fix works
drain the GPU and stop scheduling work on it. Resume the job from a checkpoint written BEFORE the first remap failure, results computed after it are suspect. This changes the condition in the causal diagnosis instead of hiding the outer exception. The repeated control proves ownership before recovery from checkpoint predating the first remap failure.
Code examples
# Preserve evidence before restarting
dmesg -T | grep -iE 'NVRM|Xid|AER|NVLink|ECC'
nvidia-smi -q
dcgmi diag -r 3
# Find the exact signature in the complete log
rg -n -F -- "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" <log-file>Adapt the snippet to your framework. The same pattern holds for PyTorch Lightning, Hugging Face Trainer, DeepSpeed, Megatron-LM, and vLLM training wrappers. Where the wrapper exposes a config flag (for examplelr_scheduler_type in Trainer), prefer the flag over the imperative API to keep the schedule declarative and reproducible.
Best practices by model family
| Model / Stack | Recommendation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| First response | Preserve the first failure | Keep the context before "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" so aggregation does not erase causality. |
| Confirmation | Change one variable | Use a known-good node, rank, input, or configuration as the control. |
| Recovery | Resume from checkpoint predating the first remap failure | Resume only after the literal signature no longer appears in the same control. |
With the fix vs without the fix
| Dimension | With the fix | Without the fix |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence | First preceding error and one controlled comparison | Only the final aggregated exception |
| Fix | drain the GPU and stop scheduling work on it. Resume the job from a checkpoint written BEFORE the first remap failure, results computed after it are suspect. | Retrying the unchanged workload |
| Exit criterion | "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" is absent in the repeated control | The job happened to run once |
Real engineering notes
“Treat "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" as a search key and an investigation checkpoint, not as proof of every cause associated with the phrase. The high-value evidence is what changed immediately before it and whether the failure follows the workload, node, or configuration.”
Visual fingerprint
literal error captured
|
v
find first preceding failure
|
v
run one known-good control
|
+-- follows workload --> inspect input or configuration
+-- follows node ------> inspect hardware or platform
+-- disappears --------> validate the targeted fixDiagnose this failure in VS Code
Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.
Install the free VS Code extensionRelated failures to investigate next
Root cause
- HBM row remapping failed: the GPU has exhausted its reserve of spare memory rows and can no longer retire failing ones. This is a terminal hardware state, the GPU will keep producing uncorrectable ECC errors and must be replaced.
- The decisive evidence is the first log line that precedes "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" and differs from a healthy run.
- A nearby failure remains a competing hypothesis until a control separates configuration, capacity, transport, and hardware causes.
The fix and how to prevent it
Unlock the full remediation runbook
14 days on the Scale plan, up to 50 diagnoses a day. Step-by-step remediation, the RMA evidence payload, and multi-node correlation on your own logs. No card, and it does not roll into a subscription.
Frequently asked questions
Twelve targeted questions that engineers and on-call staff most commonly ask about this failure.
What does "DCGM_FI_DEV_ROW_REMAP_FAILURE pending row remap failed bank row reserve exhausted" mean?
Is this line always the root cause?
What should I collect before restarting?
What is the fastest confirmation?
How do I prevent it from recurring?
Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run
The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.