For wake forest deac infrastructure and platform teams
Wake Forest DEAC: login-host limit or scheduled GPU job?
Connect the first useful exception with the relevant runtime evidence. Was the heavy process running on a DEAC login node?
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Wake Forest DEAC workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team already resolved with the first failure, cited evidence and remaining questions. Was the heavy process running on a DEAC login node? Only assign a rank, device or safe recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Was the heavy process running on a DEAC login node?
Evidence to compare: Execution hostname, job allocation and relevant host-memory limit event.
Login-node limits can stop preparation before scheduled GPU work starts. Establish where the process ran instead of interpreting a login-host kill as exhausted VRAM.
Did host memory or device memory run out?
Evidence to compare: Container or scheduler host-memory limit, process kill evidence and first allocation exception.
Host memory and device memory are different resources. A host-memory kill needs different evidence from a GPU allocator failure; identify the failed operation before changing a limit.
Did artifact writing complete before storage filled?
Evidence to compare: Approved output path, quota result and the saved-artifact writer completion.
A full filesystem can invalidate the latest save even when training reached its final step. The existence of a filename does not establish a complete recovery checkpoint.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
