For uc santa cruz hummingbird infrastructure and platform teams
UC Santa Cruz Hummingbird: CPU memory partition or assigned GPU?
Connect the first useful exception with the relevant runtime evidence. Did the selected Hummingbird partition include a GPU?
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved UC Santa Cruz Hummingbird workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team already resolved with the first failure, cited evidence and remaining questions. Did the selected Hummingbird partition include a GPU? Only assign a rank, device or safe recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Did the selected Hummingbird partition include a GPU?
Evidence to compare: Submitted partition, allocation record and process-visible device list.
A larger-memory CPU node is not a larger-memory GPU allocation. Establish the resource class before treating unavailable CUDA devices as a driver fault.
Does the executable match the allocated architecture?
Evidence to compare: Actual CPU and GPU architecture, image identity and the first loader error.
A binary built for another architecture can fail before useful computation. Confirm the allocated hardware and software combination before recommending changes to the device.
Did artifact writing complete before storage filled?
Evidence to compare: Approved output path, quota result and the saved-artifact writer completion.
A full filesystem can invalidate the latest save even when training reached its final step. The existence of a filename does not establish a complete recovery checkpoint.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
