For psc bridges-2 infrastructure and model engineering teams
Bridges-2 GPU job failed: allocation, launcher or worker?
Compare partition and effective GPU allocation with the worker launch. Review the first runtime error before treating every distributed exit as a network fault.
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved PSC Bridges-2 workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare the first failure, quoted evidence and unresolved questions with an incident your team has already resolved. Begin with this question: Did the job receive the intended GPUs? Only attribute a process, rank, device or recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Did the job receive the intended GPUs?
Evidence to compare: Partition, request mode and the effective GPU allocation.
The public guide distinguishes full-node and shared GPU workflows. Confirm the intended mode before reasoning about missing devices or worker counts.
Did launch geometry match that allocation?
Evidence to compare: Node count, process count and the first launcher or worker exception.
A process cannot be assigned by guessing from the hardware model alone. Preserve the actual launch and any rank-to-device mapping.
What explains the later peer failure?
Evidence to compare: The earliest worker error and subsequent communication messages.
A timeout can follow an earlier setup or process failure. Keep a missing initiating worker explicit instead of choosing a device without evidence.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
