For old dominion research computing infrastructure and platform teams
Old Dominion Research Computing: cloud provisioning, image drift or worker startup?
Connect the first useful exception with the relevant runtime evidence. Did the cloud node become ready before the containerized worker launched?
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Old Dominion Research Computing workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team already resolved with the first failure, cited evidence and remaining questions. Did the cloud node become ready before the containerized worker launched? Only assign a rank, device or safe recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Did the cloud node become ready before the containerized worker launched?
Evidence to compare: Waterfield provisioning event, image or environment revision and first startup exception.
A cloud-capacity failure precedes application execution, while changing packages can break a previously working environment. Preserve that timeline before escalating a hardware incident.
Did the container expose the expected runtime and device?
Evidence to compare: Container image revision, device visibility and first library initialization error.
Host and container environments can differ. Confirm the failing process context before interpreting a missing library or unavailable device as a hardware fault.
Did artifact writing complete before storage filled?
Evidence to compare: Approved output path, quota result and the saved-artifact writer completion.
A full filesystem can invalidate the latest save even when training reached its final step. The existence of a filename does not establish a complete recovery checkpoint.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
