For juelich juwels infrastructure and model engineering teams
JUWELS GPU training stall: launch geometry or an earlier worker error?
Compare rank placement, assigned devices and the first exception from the selected JUWELS module. Keep device sharing and application parallelism distinct.
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Juelich JUWELS workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare the first failure, quoted evidence and unresolved questions with an incident your team has already resolved. Begin with this question: Which module and GPUs did the job use? Only attribute a process, rank, device or recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Which module and GPUs did the job use?
Evidence to compare: Module, effective allocation and rank-to-device placement.
A system name alone cannot identify the execution environment. Preserve the assigned hardware and mapping before attributing a failure to a rank or device.
Was device sharing part of the launch?
Evidence to compare: Scheduler options, relevant MPS setting and application launch output.
Sharing configuration and process placement can affect how work reaches a GPU. Record those settings rather than interpreting utilization in isolation.
Which failure preceded the collective symptom?
Evidence to compare: The first worker traceback and corresponding host or transport events.
A waiting collective can reflect an earlier process failure. Require time alignment and identifiers before assigning a device, network or scheduler cause.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
