For johns hopkins rockfish infrastructure and platform teams
Johns Hopkins Rockfish: GPU memory class or input filesystem?
Connect the first useful exception with the relevant runtime evidence. Which Rockfish GPU memory class was assigned?
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Johns Hopkins Rockfish workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team already resolved with the first failure, cited evidence and remaining questions. Which Rockfish GPU memory class was assigned? Only assign a rank, device or safe recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Which Rockfish GPU memory class was assigned?
Evidence to compare: Allocated device model and memory, job request and first allocation traceback.
One GPU family can contain different memory capacities. Compare the assigned device before treating a model that fits another node as evidence of faulty hardware.
Was input delivery interrupted before the timeout?
Evidence to compare: Input-reader progress, first read exception and matched worker timestamps.
A stalled input stage can leave downstream workers waiting. Establish the earlier event before attributing the final symptom to communication or device capacity.
Did artifact writing complete before storage filled?
Evidence to compare: Approved output path, quota result and the saved-artifact writer completion.
A full filesystem can invalidate the latest save even when training reached its final step. The existence of a filename does not establish a complete recovery checkpoint.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
