For core42 infrastructure and model engineering teams
Core42 GPU support: identify the accelerator before the remedy.
Compare approved workload logs with scheduler and host context. Separate tenant startup, memory and communication failures before assigning the next investigation.
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Core42 workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team has already resolved with the first failure, quoted evidence and remaining questions. Begin with this question: Which accelerator and software stack ran this job? Only assign a process, device or recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Which accelerator and software stack ran this job?
Evidence to compare: Actual device vendor, image revision and the scheduler allocation.
Begin with deployed hardware, not the cloud brand. A CUDA-specific interpretation is unsuitable when the incident belongs to another accelerator stack.
Did orchestration fail before application execution?
Evidence to compare: Job or pod events, container startup and the first retained traceback.
A scheduling or image failure may prevent model execution entirely. Keep provisioning evidence distinct from a process that starts and later fails.
Can the evidence leave its security boundary?
Evidence to compare: An approved redacted excerpt and the permitted incident-sharing scope.
Use information approved for this evaluation. A public page establishes neither data-residency compliance nor permission to export tenant logs.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
