For columbia research computing infrastructure and model engineering teams
Columbia burst job requeued: policy interruption or runtime failure?
Compare the queue decision with the worker and checkpoint timeline. A requeued batch script is not evidence that the application recovered its previous state.
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved Columbia Research Computing workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare the first failure, quoted evidence and unresolved questions with an incident your team has already resolved. Begin with this question: Which queue and policy applied to this run? Only attribute a process, rank, device or recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Which queue and policy applied to this run?
Evidence to compare: Cluster, account, partition and scheduler reason for the affected attempt.
A newer burst policy can differ from an older technical overview. Keep the actual job context rather than assuming all Columbia jobs have the same interruption behavior.
Did requeue restart the script or restore training?
Evidence to compare: Restart output, checkpoint load result and recovered step metadata.
Scheduler acceptance only establishes that another attempt can run. Recovery requires valid application state and a successful load.
What error occurred before the restart?
Evidence to compare: The first worker exception and checkpoint writer outcome.
A policy interruption and a separate application failure can coexist. A reviewable timeline keeps them distinct and preserves unresolved evidence.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
