For university of alberta sdre infrastructure and platform teams
University of Alberta SDRE: secure gateway, container startup or compute job?
Connect the first useful exception with the relevant runtime evidence. Did failure occur at the gateway or inside the allocated container?
Free 30-day Team evaluation. No card or automatic subscription. Work email verification required.
Replay a resolved University of Alberta SDRE workflow incident
Upload your log file. Review the selected evidence and masking, then run diagnosis. Keep the original log for any follow-up questions.
Before uploading, review cloud data handling and local options.
Upload your log file. Large files are processed in your browser. Only selected evidence is submitted when you run diagnosis.
Try Denpex for 30 days. FREE.
No credit card. No automatic subscription. See whether Denpex helps with an incident you already understand.
Start your free 30-day Team evaluation
Up to 50 diagnoses a day for 30 days. Verify your work email to activate an eligible company evaluation, then replay a resolved incident and compare the evidence and next steps with your team's confirmed cause.
What a useful evaluation should establish
Compare one incident your team already resolved with the first failure, cited evidence and remaining questions. Did failure occur at the gateway or inside the allocated container? Only assign a rank, device or safe recovery state when the submitted evidence establishes it.
Did failure occur at the gateway or inside the allocated container?
Evidence to compare: Approved redacted stage identifier, module or container revision and first startup exception.
Access checks and container initialization can fail independently of GPU execution. Establish the permitted evidence boundary before sharing any log or escalating a device incident.
What evidence is approved for the support handoff?
Evidence to compare: Redacted job metadata, first exception and the permitted log-sharing boundary.
A public workflow grants no permission to export private data. Review approved operational excerpts without customer payloads, credentials or research datasets.
Did the container expose the expected runtime and device?
Evidence to compare: Container image revision, device visibility and first library initialization error.
Host and container environments can differ. Confirm the failing process context before interpreting a missing library or unavailable device as a hardware fault.
Use Denpex alongside your existing telemetry tools to investigate submitted incident evidence. With monitoring configured on a supported plan, detected failures can trigger alerts and an automatic diagnosis from the captured evidence.
Inside Denpex
See the evidence, not just the claim
Follow the causal chain, inspect the quoted evidence and prepare the next handoff. These actual product captures use founder-account examples and the VS Code extension, with the source identified under each image. Open a capture to inspect it at full size.
Follow the failure through the cascade

Prepare the hardware escalation

Ask for the evidence that is missing

Keep the investigation in the editor
