Training Stuck No Progress
Training appears stuck with no progress, often caused by deadlocks, infinite loops, or network hangs in distributed training.
Training appears stuck with no progress, often caused by deadlocks, infinite loops, or network hangs in distributed training.
What this failure is
Training Stuck No Progress is a Reliability failure seen during ML training runs. Training appears stuck with no progress, often caused by deadlocks, infinite loops, or network hangs in distributed training. Common tags: Stuck, No Progress, Deadlock, Harness.
Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.
You're reading about Training Stuck No Progress. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.
Want 14 days on the Scale plan?
Request an evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates up to 50 diagnoses a day, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card or automatic subscription.
Why it happens (the mechanism)
Deadlock in distributed training. Data loading is the bottleneck. Learning rate too small (no visible progress). No gradient flow (detached graph). All-reduce hang in DDP. Taken together, these mechanisms explain why the failure is reproducible, why it tends to surface on specific workloads or scales, and why generic mitigation attempts often fall short without addressing the underlying cause.
What you'll observe
- Training loss doesn't decrease
- No progress for many iterations
- GPU utilization drops to zero
Common symptoms and what they mean
| Symptom | Why it happens |
|---|---|
| Loss is flat for many steps | Deadlock in distributed training |
| Validation metrics don't improve | Data loading is the bottleneck |
| Training time is way over estimate | Learning rate too small (no visible progress) |
Which systems are affected
- Distributed training with hangs
- Complex models with deadlocks
- Long training runs
How to confirm this is the problem
Use this checklist to test the hypothesis against a small reproduction. No single line proves the root cause, so preserve the preceding events and compare one variable at a time.
- ✓Reproduce the failure from a clean checkpoint/seed: the symptom must appear without warm-up state from a previous run.
- ✓Verified signal present: Loss is flat for many steps
- ✓Verified signal present: Validation metrics don't improve
- ✓Verified signal present: Training time is way over estimate
- ✓A targeted fix from the "How to fix it" section eliminates or substantially reduces the symptom within one validation pass.
The fix and the prevention pattern
The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, saved history, and the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.
Sign up free. Unlock the full analysisNo credit card. Daily allowance follows verified trust tier. Instant access.
Diagnose this failure in VS Code
Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.
Install the free VS Code extensionRelated failures to investigate next
Root cause
- Deadlock in distributed training
- Data loading is the bottleneck
- Learning rate too small (no visible progress)
- No gradient flow (detached graph)
- All-reduce hang in DDP
The fix and how to prevent it
Evaluate Denpex on your own logs
Request a Scale evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates 14 days with up to 50 diagnoses a day. Every account keeps its current diagnosis allowance and gets a verification path. No card or automatic subscription.
Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run
The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.
Related Reliability errors
Sequence Length Imbalance Causing Distributed Training Stragglers
Reliability · high
Silent Data Corruption from GPU Hardware Faults Causing Loss Spikes and Model Divergence
Reliability · critical
NIXL Firmware Page Registration Fan-Out Triggers Host OOM Kills on HGX H200 and B200
Reliability · critical
MTTF Scaling Inversely with GPU Count in Large ML Research Clusters
Reliability · high