OOM Killed Mid-Step
OOM kills during training are abrupt and lose progress, often happening mid-step when peak memory is reached.
OOM kills during training are abrupt and lose progress, often happening mid-step when peak memory is reached.
What this failure is
OOM Killed Mid-Step is a Reliability failure seen during ML training runs. OOM kills during training are abrupt and lose progress, often happening mid-step when peak memory is reached. Common tags: Oom, Oom Killer, Memory, Reliability.
Is this what broke your run? Paste your log.
You're reading about OOM Killed Mid-Step. Paste your own crash log or traceback below and get the real root cause for YOUR run, not this generic entry. No account, no card. Logs are masked at ingress and never saved to account history.
Want 14 days on the Scale plan?
Request an evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates up to 50 diagnoses a day, alerts, history, and follow-up questions. No credit card or automatic subscription.
Why it happens (the mechanism)
Peak memory exceeds available. Memory leak grows until OOM. Cgroup limit lower than job memory. Other processes consume memory. Taken together, these mechanisms explain why the failure is reproducible, why it tends to surface on specific workloads or scales, and why generic mitigation attempts often fall short without addressing the underlying cause.
What you'll observe
- Training process is killed with OOM
- Job disappears with exit code 137
- No graceful shutdown on OOM
Common symptoms and what they mean
| Symptom | Why it happens |
|---|---|
| dmesg shows OOM killer | Peak memory exceeds available |
| Exit code 137 (SIGKILL) | Memory leak grows until OOM |
| Process vanishes during training step | Cgroup limit lower than job memory |
Which systems are affected
- Memory-intensive training jobs
- Long-running training with growing memory
- Cgroup-based resource limits
How to confirm this is the problem
Use this checklist to test the hypothesis against a small reproduction. No single line proves the root cause, so preserve the preceding events and compare one variable at a time.
- ✓Reproduce the failure from a clean checkpoint/seed: the symptom must appear without warm-up state from a previous run.
- ✓Verified signal present: dmesg shows OOM killer
- ✓Verified signal present: Exit code 137 (SIGKILL)
- ✓Verified signal present: Process vanishes during training step
- ✓A targeted fix from the "How to fix it" section eliminates or substantially reduces the symptom within one validation pass.
The fix and the prevention pattern
The root cause is on this page and stays free. A free account adds the exact remediation steps, saved history, and the fix on every entry in the encyclopedia.
Sign up free. Unlock the full analysisNo credit card. Daily allowance follows verified trust tier. Instant access.
Diagnose this failure in VS Code
Select the traceback or open the failed terminal, then run Denpex locally to see the initiating rank, collateral failures, exact fix, and verification command without uploading the log.
Install the free VS Code extensionRelated failures to investigate next
Root cause
- Peak memory exceeds available
- Memory leak grows until OOM
- Cgroup limit lower than job memory
- Other processes consume memory
The fix and how to prevent it
Evaluate Denpex on your own logs
Request a Scale evaluation code. A verified workplace organization activates 14 days with up to 50 diagnoses a day. Every account keeps its current diagnosis allowance and gets a verification path. No card or automatic subscription.
Don't just read the fix, diagnose your run
The encyclopedia tells you what went wrong. Denpex tells you what went wrong in YOUR training run. With your logs, your config, and your stack.
Related Reliability errors
Sequence Length Imbalance Causing Distributed Training Stragglers
Reliability · high
Silent Data Corruption from GPU Hardware Faults Causing Loss Spikes and Model Divergence
Reliability · critical
NIXL Firmware Page Registration Fan-Out Triggers Host OOM Kills on HGX H200 and B200
Reliability · critical
MTTF Scaling Inversely with GPU Count in Large ML Research Clusters
Reliability · high